Edit/Update Action
Rails Controller Conventions
Now that you know how to implement a create action, the next logical step will be to integrate an edit/update action. As you may have noticed, there is a trend in Rails conventions where the logic for rendering a form is separate from the action that manages the database record alteration. For example:
The
new
action in the controller simply renders thenew
formThe
create
action is what actually handles the process of inserting the form data into the database
In like fashion, the edit
and update
actions have a similar convention:
The
edit
action will handle rendering theedit
formThe
update
action will be the method that updates the database record itself
Rendering the edit
form
edit
formTo start off, let's draw a get
route for our edit form. Since the form will need to know which record is being edited, this will need to be a dynamic route that accepts an :id
as a parameter that the controller can access:
We still need to draw one additional route to handle the update
action. This second route will also need to be dynamic, accepting the same :id
as a parameter so that the action will know which record is being altered. If you're curious about which HTTP verb should be selected, consider the following: we're sending data to the server, so we know it's not GET
, and since we're not creating a new record it shouldn't be POST
. That's right- PATCH
should be the HTTP verb!
Note: What about PUT
? PUT
will actually work just fine here, but briefly, PUT
is meant to be used when replacing a whole resource. PATCH
, on the other hand, is for used for sending a set of changes to a resource.
If you run rake routes
, you will see we have some new routes:
On a side note, as a shortcut you could also simply add the edit
and update
actions to the resources
call in the routes file. That would accomplish the same goal that these two lines do:
This will give you the same routes along with a PUT
route for articles#update
.
With our routes in place, let's add in the controller actions...
...and then create the edit view template in app/views/articles/edit.html.erb
. Let's just copy and paste the new
form:
If you open the browser and go to the edit
page, it will now display the form, but you may have noticed a pretty big flaw. It doesn't load the record's data into the form! There are a few things that we'll need to do in order to implement this behavior. First, let's have our edit
action store the article
record in an instance variable:
Now that the edit
view template will have access to the Article
object (stored in @article
), we need to refactor the form so that it auto-fills the form fields with the corresponding data from @article
. We'll also use a different form helper, form_for
, which will automatically set up the url where the form will be sent. These changes can be seen below:
In this case, form_for
takes care of some work for us. Using the object @article
we've provided, form_for
determines that @article
is not a new instance of the Article
class. Because of this, form_for
knows to automatically send to the update path.
Since @article
is not a new instance of Article
, the inputs on this form, the text field and text area, will be populated with the corresponding object values.
When submitted, the form will be routed to the update
action. Before we try to implement the update
action, let's first make sure the data is being routed properly. Enter the following code inside of the update
method:
The raise
method will cause the application to pause and print out the params
on an error page. You could also see the params
if you called puts params.inspect
; using puts
would simply require you to track down the data in the Rails server log.
If you open up the browser, navigate to an edit page (such as localhost:3000/articles/2/edit
), change some elements in the form, and submit it, it should take you to an error page that prints out the params from the form, such as in the below image:
As you can see, the parameters are being passed to the update
action. With that in mind, let's implement the functionality needed inside of the update
action so that it will take the form data and update the specified record. Let's sketch out a basic flow for what the update
action should do:
Query the database for the
Article
record that matches the:id
passed to the route.Store the query in an instance variable.
Update the values passed from the form (the update method here is the
update
method supplied by Active Record, not theupdate
method we're creating). The update method takes a hash of the attributes for the model as its argument, e.g. `Article.find(1).update(title: "I'm Changed", description: "And here too!")Save the changes in the database.
Redirect the user to the
show
page so they can see the updated record.
We'll take advantage of Active Record's update
method so that we're not manually assigning each attribute:
Now if you go to the edit
page and make changes to the title
or description
form elements, you will see they are changed when the form is submitted. The edit
and update
functions are working properly!
Extra Credit
When only one form element is updated, such as the
title
, does thedescription
also get updated?How could we refactor this form code? You may notice that we have a form for the
new
andedit
actions. Is there a better way of doing this?
Last updated